迦克墩公会议(公元451年)
Council of Chalcedon (451)
451年10月8日至11月1日,会议于迦克墩(今Kadıköy)颁布基督论《定义》,称同一基督“在两个本性中”,不混、不变、不分、不离。待审种子。
From 8 October to 1 November 451 at Chalcedon (modern Kadıköy), the council issued a Definition of one and the same Christ “in two natures,” without confusion, change, division, or separation. Needs-review seed.
- 日期 · Date
- 8 October – 1 November 451(day-range)
- 时代 · Era
- 晚期古代帝国教会Late Antique Imperial Church
- 主题 · Themes
- chalcedon
- christology
- ecumenical-councils
- imperial-church
本条审阅状态为「needs-review」,尚未作为经审定的历史种子内容发布。Review status is “needs-review”; not published as reviewed seed history.
概要
迦克墩公会议于公元451年10月8日至11月1日在迦克墩(Chalcedon,今土耳其伊斯坦布尔Kadıköy)举行。会议颁布基督论**《定义》(Definition),表述同一位**基督“在两个本性中”(in two natures),并以“不混淆、不改变、不分割、不分离”等否定式限定双方关系。
本条是待审种子,不作教派论战文,也不声称辩论就此永久结束。
接受史(需谨慎表述)
- 罗马天主教会与东正教会传统通常视迦克墩为第四次大公会议。
- 东方正统教会(Oriental Orthodox churches)不接受迦克墩的权威表述;对话与历史研究仍在进行。
- 请勿将东方正统基督徒贬称为“一性论异端 / Monophysite heretics”——该标签在历史与今日对话中常被批评为误导或论战用语。
- 第28条教规(Canon 28)涉及教区优先次序等问题,在后世受到争议;其文本、当时接受范围与长期效力,不宜简化成一句口号。
English overview
The Council of Chalcedon met at Chalcedon (modern Kadıköy) from 8 October to 1 November 451. Its Definition speaks of one and the same Christ “in two natures,” without confusion, change, division, or separation.
Reception is divided: Catholic and Eastern Orthodox traditions receive Chalcedon as the fourth ecumenical council; Oriental Orthodox churches do not. Do not call Oriental Orthodox Christians “Monophysite heretics.” Canon 28 was later contested and must not be oversimplified. The council did not permanently end christological debate.
声明 · Claims
区分史实、解释与后世接受史。· Distinguishes fact, interpretation, and reception.
- 史实Fact
会议于451年10月8日至11月1日在迦克墩(今伊斯坦布尔Kadıköy)举行,颁布《定义》,描述同一位基督“在两个本性中”,不混淆、不改变、不分割、不分离。
The council met at Chalcedon (modern Kadıköy) from 8 October to 1 November 451 and issued a Definition describing one and the same Christ “in two natures,” without confusion, change, division, or separation.
来源引用 · Sources: 迦克墩公会议定义与教规(451) (chalcedon-definition);Price与Gaddis编《迦克墩公会议文献》 (price-gaddis-chalcedon)
- 接受史Reception
罗马天主教会与东正教会传统接受迦克墩为第四次大公会议;东方正统教会不接受迦克墩。不宜将东方正统基督徒称为“一性论异端”。第28条教规在后世亦受争议,其含义与效力不能简单一笔带过。
Catholic and Eastern Orthodox traditions accept Chalcedon as the fourth ecumenical council; Oriental Orthodox churches do not. Oriental Orthodox Christians must not be labeled “Monophysite heretics.” Canon 28 was later contested and should not be oversimplified.
来源引用 · Sources: 迦克墩公会议定义与教规(451) (chalcedon-definition);Price与Gaddis编《迦克墩公会议文献》 (price-gaddis-chalcedon)
来源 · Sources
- 一手Primary迦克墩公会议定义与教规(451)Council of Chalcedon (451), Definition and Canons
Council of Chalcedon (451), Definition and Canons. Primary conciliar texts (Fordham Internet History Sourcebooks).
- 二手SecondaryPrice与Gaddis编《迦克墩公会议文献》Richard Price and Michael Gaddis, The Acts of the Council of Chalcedon
Richard Price and Michael Gaddis, The Acts of the Council of Chalcedon. Modern scholarly edition and translation of the acts.
原文链接https://obnb.uk/p13269745-the-acts-of-the-council-of-chalcedon
相关经文(接受史) · Related Scripture
非证明经文。下列经文记录后世辩论或传统中的引用与接受,不作为本条历史主张的“证明文本”。Not proof text. Passages below document later use in debate or tradition (reception history), not biblical proof of the historical claim.
本条未列出相关经文。· No related Scripture listed.